Landlord not liable for any damages to tenant

Reviewed by Marcus A. Hall, Founder
Red flag
Often unenforceable, and a signal of a problem landlord.
Quick answer

A clause absolving the landlord of all liability is usually unenforceable — especially for gross negligence or habitability failures.

Did this answer your question?

Is this clause in your lease?

Upload your lease and we'll flag this clause (and every other red flag) in 30 seconds — free.

What it actually means

Landlords can't contract away responsibility for maintaining safe, habitable premises. This clause may scare tenants but rarely holds up.

Renters insurance covers your stuff — but the landlord's negligence (e.g., faulty wiring causing fire) is their problem, not yours.

What it looks like in a lease

"Landlord shall not be liable for any injury, loss, or damage to Tenant or Tenant's property, regardless of cause."

What to watch for

  • Whether gross negligence is excepted
  • Whether it conflicts with habitability warranty

How to negotiate it

'Please add: except for Landlord's gross negligence or breach of warranty of habitability.'

When it crosses into a red flag

  • Blanket waiver
  • No exceptions

Frequently asked questions

Can I sue anyway?

Yes — the clause is likely void as against public policy for serious claims.

Related clauses

General information, not legal advice. Clauses are interpreted differently across states and courts. For a binding interpretation of your specific lease, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Chat with VincentTenant-rights AI